Two things make a pretty awesome post

Standard

First, anyone who’s ever stood within earshot of me for more than 30 seconds has heard me say that Child of Fire was named to Publishers Weekly’s Best 100 Books of 2009 (hmm, the formatting for that page looks to have been borked at some point, possibly by a change in themes).

Well, Game of Cages didn’t make this years list, but Genreville editor Rose Fox did give it an honorable mention in the fantasy category.

A close but no cigar! Hey, I’m happy to make Miss Congeniality for a book where the protagonist lays into a crowd of people with a length of pipe. Thank you, Rose!

Second, the Twenty Palaces book trailer begins shooting in less than two weeks, and I have permission to link to the photo of the actor who’s been cast as Ray Lilly. Here he is.

What do you think? Does he look like your vision of the character?

Randomness for 11/5

Standard

1) Tired of arguing about science on Twitter? Let a computer program do it for you. via Jay Lake

2) “It was just a wasp, Dad.

3) Popping corn in super slow-motion. Video.

4) Least popular monsters.

5) The many types of author panels.

6) This is one awesome mom.

7) Wasteland the movie trailer. Video, but it doesn’t auto-start. This is a documentary I’ll be watching when I get a chance.

Book survey and other writing links.

Standard

I’m reposting this because it didn’t cross post. Sorry

Here’s a bunch of links for books and writing. For starters: NPR is conducting an online survey about how they can improve their book coverage.. If you’re a listener, please do fill this out to let them know what you want.

Personally, I suggested they set aside a segment on weekend mornings for genre fiction, and have an expert in different genres (romance, mystery, sf, etc) rotate through to discuss the latest trends, awards, and best-sellers. I also reminded them that many of their readers are big nerds, and they should take notice of that.

Doing NaNoWriMo? Gosh, if only someone would write an article of writing advice for you! And if only someone else say, Laura Miller at Salon, would express some kind of disapproval of the way it’s run. Because then someone else could jump in with a misguided but completely understandable misreading of Miller’s article. And after that, Miller could write the clarification in the way she should have written the original article.

Skip Miller’s original article and jump right to the response, I say. She makes a fine point. [Update: stupid LATimes website won’t let me link directly to Laura Millers response in the comments of the Book Jacket post. You can skim through and find it at November 03, 2010 at 02:41 PM, though.]

Next, I’ll bet you thought the ebook pricing debate had already been found dead in its stable, but the CEO of Thomas Nelson Publishers wants to take the whip to it all the same. He’s convinced me, but I’m not a Kindle person.

What does Jim Butcher read? Watch the video to the end to find out. Also: spoilers for his latest book, CHANGES, in that interview. (For those who don’t want to watch the video, he mentions me as an author to watch for.)

And finally, Nick Mamatas points to an editor who snatched content off the web and published it without permission in her magazine. When the writer contacted the magazine about it, the editor replied with the most amazing email fail ever. Really, it has to be seen to be believed.

This one is spreading around blogs and Twitter like a wildfire, and the magazine’s Facebook page is currently being barraged by outraged comments. Awesome.

Quote of the day

Standard

There was a period in the 90s where I was writing a lot of science fiction screenplays because it was a popular genre. For the most part, a science fiction movie is really just an action movie that takes place in the future. Sure, there are exceptions like GATACA, but mostly you have TOTAL RECALL and JUDGE DREDD and TERMINATOR and I ROBOT and MINORITY REPORT. In a science fiction script you start with what one big thing makes the world different – Apes have taken over? Food shortage plus population boom so we all eat Soylent Green? The Zombie Apocalypse happened and now you are the Last Man On Earth? There are psychics who tell the police who to arrest before they commit the crime? There is one big change, which is tied to the theme (point) of your story.

–Bill Martell, screenwriter (and practical man)

Reviews, Part 21

Standard

New reviews of my work:

1) Patrick of Pat’s Fantasy Hotlist gave Game of Cages 7.5 out of ten because he liked the book I wrote but would have liked a different book better. “Game of Cages is an entertaining blen of urban fantasy, mystery, and action. The pace is crisp, making this one another page-turner.

I’m honestly tempted to tell him not to bother with the rest of my books because it seems pretty clear that we’re not interested in the same things.

2) Rob D. Smith at A Thousand Masks liked Game of Cages quite a bit. “But if you like tautly crafted hardboiled magic tales, go out and get this book.

3) MTimonin also liked Game of Cages, and sees where the overall story is going. “Connolly has some very good characters here, and his premise is intriguing.

4) K.C. Shaw at Skunk Cat Book Reviews loved Child of Fire very much. “In short, this is probably the perfect example of an urban fantasy.

5) K.C. Shaw also read Game of Cages and liked it a lot, although not as much as the first book: “I don’t usually read sequels immediately after reading the previous books. This series is too amazing to resist, though.

6) The most thoroughly neutral review of Child of Fire yet: “It would be accurate to say that if one likes Butcher’s work, Connolly’s will have some appeal.” That sentence is as close as the reviewer comes to expressing an outright opinion on the book; I’ll take that as a “didn’t care for it.”

7) Drey at Drey’s Library gave Child of Fire a “Good” rating: “Child of Fire is a pretty good first offering from Harry Connelly, and I’ll be finding out how Ray fares in the next installment, Game of Cages.

Randomness for Halloween

Standard

1) Can self-replicated Lego Robots be far behind? via Rose Fox.

2) Explain the internet to a 19th century British street urchin. Flow charts are funny. also via Rose Fox.

3) A Halloween edition of Great Comics that Never Happened! I love this one.

4) Heeeeeelllllllo, teddy bear! Who know Charlie Sheen could set his own eyes on fire in real life! Video.

5) 11 Awesome skiffy-themed animated gifs. I can’t decide if my favorite is Khan finding Waldo or Picard tommy-gunning Chunk.

6) This is how I’ve always imagined an agent’s office would be run.

7) Baby Powerhouse Remix. Video. This is a nice antidote to all the Halloween creepy grossness. Unless babies freak you out.

Halloween followup

Standard

Friday night, my wife and son stayed up until midnight listening to L.A. Theater Works’s production of War of the Worlds and Lost World. You can listen at the site, at least for a while. Give it a try. My son rated it “Awesome!”

Randomness for 10/28

Standard

1) Ten things to know about the future of comics. Some of these are applicable for fiction, too.

2) Ben Kenobi, Private Jedeye. Video.

3) Kate Beaton makes Halloween comics just for YOU!

4) Champions Online is going to become a free MMORPG. Not that I’ll know anything about it, because I can’t have that sort of nice thing.

5) How to communicate with writers. via Jay Lake

6) Is Climate Change Real? Attn Google: Rank that link number one.

7) Some amazing carved pumpkins. But what an awful website layout.

Rules for photographers (and every other artist)

Standard

But first, an essay describing the way I conducted my search for an agent is online now at Black Gate. Check it out, if you’re interested in that sort of thing.

There’s also this, sent to me in email by a smart friend. They’re rules for “any young photographer trying to survive.”

Here are the rules:

1. Have talent. (Talent is not when your friends tell you they love your work, but when people who don’t like you have to admit it’s good.)

2. Understand how the world works. (Not just globally, but on a macro level. Understand what people need and don’t need. Understand when to approach people and when not to. Develop social skills.)

3. Choose good friends. (There’s nothing like an effective network.)

4. Be modern. (Don’t do anything that looks like it’s someone else’s work. Stay on top of technology. Engage on multiple platforms.)

There’s more wisdom at the dude’s site, but I wanted to talk about this. Also, I want to break it down.

1- Talent: I’ve talked about talent before (but for some reason I can’t find where). Personally, I think “talent” is something you can learn, to a degree. How much of a degree, I don’t know, but if its something people can work on it’s worth talking about, and if it’s not it’s not. I prefer to treat it as something you can control, because otherwise it doesn’t matter.

So: Practice intelligently, study carefully, and work hard. And if anyone remembers where I argued my “Talent is accuracy” thing (I think it was on someone else’s blog) or if you want me to type it up here, let me know.

2- Social skills: Yeah. It’s easy to think of this as outside the work we create, as in: I write a great book but I’m such an asshole no one wants to deal with me. Or readers stumble onto my book, love it, search me out online only to discover that my blog is full of crazy hate-filled crap. Or I obsessively follow people around, IRL or online, continually tweeting at Wil Wheaton that he should read my book and tell all his followers how much he loves it.

That’s… er… not optimal. But there’s a second issue with this: writers who find success are often the people with strongly-held opinions. The writers who find success and last are the ones who can describe the world as it truly is, no matter the genre. I don’t mean they have a perfect understanding or that they’re without flaws, but that their books reflect some insightful understanding of how the world works.

Of course, most everyone thinks they understand how things work…

3- Friends/Networking: This is the one I expect most people would object to, especially the way the author puts it. No one really thinks you should try to make friends because you think they’ll be useful, but it’s also important not to make friends who drag you down. Your friends should make your life better, on the whole. Sure, there are times when you’ll need to support them through a rough patch–hopefully they’ll do the same for you–but if the friend hurts your ability to make your art, you should probably restructure the relationship.

Better is to have friends (and I mean real, actual friends that you enjoy being with) who are doing exciting things. Actually, let me put it this way: Your friends should be good for you. And getting that sort of friend is pretty simple: Be that kind of person yourself.

Have projects! Help people! Do exciting stuff. If someone is doing something that sounds cool, chip in. Maybe a friendship will develop. Maybe not. At least you’ll have done something cool. As the old saying goes, the best way to find someone to love is to be someone worth loving.

You’ll notice I said it was simple, not easy. I’m terrible at this sort of thing and already feel like I’m stretched thin. Maybe someday when I have enough sleep.

4- “Be modern”: This is the one I have the least to say about. Don’t write an 80’s-style fantasy or a ’40’s-style science fiction unless you’re prepared to do something very modern with it. As for platforms, what can I say? I’m always behind the times on new opportunities. I don’t even have a cell phone or a twitter account. Maybe someone else can jump in with useful advice there.

Randomness for 10/23

Standard

1) Dog Superhero Costumes. Yeah, you read that right. Now click through and blow your own mind.

2) Why I will always support the serial comma.

3) America’s contempt for expertise, part six million and two.

4) A congressional candidate’s wife does a political ad… for his opponent. Has to be seen to be believed. Video. Burn! via Jen Busick

5) Cripes. Bad enough you dress up your dog in a costume. But you have to put him in a mask? And done your own matching Na’vi cat lady costume? And make a crazy video for the web?

6) OMG, I don’t care if this is real, I’m going to pretend it’s photoshop so I can sleep at night. Be sure to look at the picture gallery. Supposedly, they released this thing after the pictures were taken. I assume it was down a long chute from a truck with the engine running. via Danny Grossman

7) Manuscript rejection notice from a silent-era movie studio.