Merry Oppressmas!

Standard

SCROOGE WAS RIGHT! Libertarian professor tries to defend Ebenezer Scrooge’s miserlyness.

Scrooge is skeptical that many would prefer death to the workhouse, and he is unmoved by talk of the workhouse’s cheerlessness. He is right to be unmoved, for society’s provisions for the poor must be, well, Dickensian. The more pleasant the alternatives to gainful employment, the greater will be the number of people who seek these alternatives, and the fewer there will be who engage in productive labor. If society expects anyone to work, work had better be a lot more attractive than idleness.

Apparently, the professor thinks that people who lose their jobs and can’t find another should have their children taken away from them, just as they did in the workhouses. Hey, if the poor have children they can’t support, what’s it to him? He never forced anyone “to father children he is having difficulty supporting.”

It’s a pathetic display that gets worse as it goes along. Don’t read it. Seriously.

When he testified before Congress regarding Dr. Wertham’s claims about the supposed harmfulness of comics, William Gaines said: “It would be just as difficult to explain the harmless thrill of a horror story to a Dr. Wertham as it would be to explain the sublimity of love to a frigid old maid.” I strongly suspect that it would be just as difficult the explain the deep satisfaction of charity to that sad, stunted author of that post.

This is beautiful

Standard

So expressive!

Well, it’s the weekend

Standard

And being the weekend, I haven’t had a lot of time on the internet.

However, let me give you this: ClickPlay. If you’re at work, mute your computer before you click that link. You won’t miss anything except some pleasant jazz.

Thank you.

Standard

A friend is working up a ghost/haunted house movie, and I’m going to collate everyone’s suggestions into a research list for him.

And WordPress is being a little over-zealous at labeling comments spam. Sorry for the delay. I’ll approve them as quickly as I can.

Probably a good thing

Standard

It’s probably a good thing that The Straight Dope broke down the “J. Edgar Hoover was a cross-dresser” story. I don’t really have time to write a “Hoover as Asia the Invincible” story.

Thunderbird doesn’t load remote images

Standard

And I don’t mind. Actually, I prefer it, even with email newsletters I’ve been receiving for a long time, like the Del Rey Internet Newsletter.

But here’s the funny thing: The latest issue of the DRIN has the announcement of all the Del Rey books that made PW’s Best of 2009 list (yeah, I know–I’ll stop talking about it eventually) but because I have Thunderbird set not to load those remote images, I saw the alt text instead. Here’s a screen cap.

Last Night in Twisted River

If you click on the image, you’ll see a larger version. Essentially, there are three novels listed there. the alt text for Daryl Gregory’s The Devil’s Alphabet is “The Devil’s Alphabet.” The alt text for China Mieville’s The City & The City is “A Prayer for Owen Meaney” (!). And right beside that, where the cover for Child of Fire should have been, it read “Last Night in Twisted River.” (!)

Now, I’d be happy to have John Irving’s Amazon.com sales ranking, but I’m sure not likely to have written a book like his.

I don’t have a point about this. I imagine Random House has a form different imprints use when they compose these things, and it doesn’t bother me at all. I was just startled to see it, and since I have a blog I’m sharing it with you.

A question for Twitterers

Standard

How much time do you spend each day reading and writing tweets?

My seven year old son made this

Standard

DomoNation.com: duplicator by ding ding

Like it? Create your own at DomoNation.com. It’s free and fun!

Does this sound dirty?

Standard

Because I’m going to link to myself.

I’ve spoken before about Wordplay.com, and how much I learned there about writing and storytelling. Well, after a friend posted a note there about my PW Best of 2009 listing, (I’ve linked to that list enough times, haven’t I? I don’t want to seem like I’m self-promoting feverishly) a couple of regulars had questions about novel-writing and publishing.

What could I do but answer? The thread is here, but it’ll age off the main message board after a while, so I’ll try to update this link when the thread hits the archives. They’re long answers, too, with a lot of detail I don’t normally write about, and with all that detail collected into one place.

Anyway, I post this not just so people can read it, if they’re interested, but so that people with more experience than I have can post contrasting experiences, or point out where I’m wrong, or even add to the general knowledge base. It’s a terrific site, with an interesting mix of professional screenwriters and serious amateurs, and I’m sure any additional information that folks can add would be more than welcome, I’m sure.

Reviews of Child of Fire, part 4

Standard

As usual, links and excerpts behind the cut:

Continue reading