The prize for the World Fantasy Award apparently includes freedom

Standard

I went to see Nancy Pearl interview Jo Walton at the UW Bookstore last night. It was an opportunity to chat briefly with some local folks I only know from online (which was a nice surprise; usually I slip in and out of these things without talking to anyone) and of course Jo Walton is a very smart person.

One thing she said that stuck with me (the whole session will air on the Seattle Channel in the near future, so you can probably hear everything she said when (if) it goes online) was that she can’t have the usual fantasy writer’s career–defined as working on a long-running series or two within a particular subgenre, and she didn’t say it in a pejorative way–because she’s too easily bored. When she was supposed to be writing the fourth book in the King’s Peace series, she couldn’t force herself to do it, and she wrote Tooth and Claw instead.

Luckily, it was accepted by her publisher. Then she added that, when she won the World Fantasy Award with it, it gave her the freedom to write what she wanted. She went from Victorian dragons to alt-historical parody mysteries, and has now released Among Others, which I haven’t read but seems to be a semi-autobiographical coming of age story with magic and a gigantic reading list.

In other words, she’s writing whatever she wants.

Unsaid (by her) is that she’s a smart and skillful writer which, you know, helps. But I hadn’t expected her to attribute so much to an award.

Maybe that’s my prejudice, since I’m not all that interested in them (don’t expect to see me post a list of my award-eligible works any time soon) and it’s possible that she’s placing too much weight on it.

Still, it’s thought-provoking. There’s an awful lot about the publishing/genre ecosystem that I don’t understand.

How DARE you write such a negative review!!!

Standard

This review is too mean!! Obviously this is all just envy! This review is less professional than the book! Grammar doesn’t matter if the book is entertaining! You mean women should deal with your mental health issues! This review is a personal attack on the author!

(I’d suspect linkbait if there were ads on that page)

Randomness for 1/11

Standard

1) Rick Santorum quotes as New Yorker cartoons.

2) The 50 most brilliant, obnoxious, or delightfully sociopathic Facebook posts of 2011.

3) The TSA’s biggest success stories of 2011, and what it means.

4) Photo tour of a remote home in the Adirondacks that was built over (and includes) an old missile silo.

5) War Horse: An Illustrated Review

6) Charles Stross makes some predictions for the future. This worked out so well for Heinlein…

7) 10 Stubborn Body Myths That Just Won’t Die, Debunked by Science

Randomness for 1/5

Standard

1) Best space photos of 2011.

2) The 2011 Wonky Awards.

3) New Zealand orcas attack great white sharks in the shallows, driving one onto the beach. Video.

4) Best of Literally Unbelievable for 2011. Part 1. Part 2.

5) A Doctor Who Timeline

6) Need a dedicated writing space? Live in Chicago. Check it out.

7) Building a Minecraft village IRL.

The “I’m Sorry Your Book Was Rejected” Thing

Standard

I meant to comment on this when it happened but I’ve been pushing like crazy on the book and it’s been the holidays and excuses excuses excuses. So I’m just going to do it now.

Last week John Scalzi hosted a debate on his blog about whether publishers think of customers as readers. Now, as I said in comments, I come down on Scalzi’s side in this as I’ve already said on my blog. I’m also highly amused by how quickly the comment thread there turned into All The Usual Comments About Ebooks, which means it was incredibly boring.

However I did want to comment on Teresa Nielsen Hayden’s comment, which Scalzi himself posted, specifically this:

I observed, not for the first time, that IMO the default answer to someone who’s ranting about the Big Six, the evilness in general of NYC publishers (who only promote bestsellers and anyway are only interested in books by celebrities), the coming selfpublipocalypse, et cetera et cetera yammer yammer yammer, is “I’m sorry your book was rejected.”

There’s a fair bit of outrage over this in comments, and I wanted to discuss it briefly because I think it’s interesting.

A few years ago, Ms. Nielsen Hayden’s comment was pretty much universally true. If, starting in about 1998, I received a dime for every time I had to read an online whine like the one described above, but I had to pay a dollar for every time that rant came from someone who was not a writer suffering the sting of rejection, I’d be typing this from the deck of my yacht right now.
It was incredibly common.

But an interesting thing happened in the years since self-publishing through ebooks took off: self-publishers who had been echoing these arguments for years began to get a larger audience, and they ate it up. People who had never tried to publish a story started talking about “gatekeepers” and “dinosaurs,” spreading some of the most pernicious myths about publishing you can find on the internet.

The non-writers spreading these memes come from all sorts of groups: Some are Kindlegarteners, who expect to pay next to nothing for a book. Some consider themselves iconoclasts, and hate anything that smacks of elitism (and for many of them, if you live or work in New York City, you’re an elitist). Some have transferred ideas about piracy, artists, and corporations directly from the music industry without alteration, acting as though publishers have their own RIAA (or will have one soon). And some just like to consider themselves ahead of the cultural curve, latching on to whatever meme sounds like it might come true.

So I’ll say that “I’m sorry your book was rejected” is an outdated response but an understandable one. I mean, “Publishers don’t consider readers their true customers” is a dumb idea, the sort of thing people tell each other because it seems like it ought to be true, but the people saying it aren’t all writers any more.

Randomness for 12/29

Standard

1) Massive 1,100+ year old Maya site discovered in Georgia’s mountains Or maybe not?

2) Do the FAA’s assertions about ebook reading during take off and landing stand up to scrutiny?

3) Images from one of the most remote and remarkable landscapes on Earth: Dallol Volcanic Crater.

4) Area 51 Alien Travel Center: a soon-to-be-built sci-fi themed brothel in Nevada. Finally, we know what will empty the last few regulars from rec.arts.sf. Anyway, I wonder if building codes will require the vats be installed on the first floor.

5) How to deal with slow walkers. Video.

6) Instead of helping you defeat an alien brood queen, this exoskeleton simulates the effects of old age for young people.

7) What if you were brought on to write a show that no one was watching and no one cared what you did? How weird could it get?

Why are they looking at me funny? Oh. Right.

Standard

For the past several weeks, people have been looking at me funny. Sometimes they grin at me like crazy. Sometimes they curl their lip. One little girl did an actual double-take just like you see in the movies.

Each and every time this happens, I think: What the hell is wrong with… Oh yeah. I forgot that I look like this: Continue reading

Randomness for 12/21

Standard

1) How to make your own chocolate D&D dice.

2) The Invisible Mother in Victorian photographs.

3) Best Christmas Webcomic Ever: “Poop us some candy, poop man!”

4) I love light shows projected onto buildings, and this one is especially good. Video.

5) The Great Successor Is Right Over Here You Guys.

6) Worse than the bedmonster.

7) Scene from THERE WILL BE BLOOD with gaze locations: Video. Via Rod Ramsey.

Randomness for 12/5

Standard

1) 5 Logical Fallacies That Make You Wrong More Than You Think

2) Awkward Christmas Photos.

3) Before and after Photoshop. (Hit the Toggle button)

4) Scholasticism of the Seventies.

5) Texts from Bennett. Hoh. Lee. Crap. via @laura_hudson

6) Skyrim reimagined as a Saturday morning cartoon in the 80’s. Video

7) Worst Nativity Sets. So many bad choices here, it’s tough to single out just one. Naked trolls? Bacon and sausage? Mexican mermaids? Damn, that doesn’t even scratch the surface.

Randomness for 11/27

Standard

1) We Watch It For You: Rage of the Yeti. OMG, why didn’t anyone tell me this exists!

2) Walking through doors causes forgetting, study determines.

3) Ultra-serious Amazon.com reviewers take on pepper spray.

4) Reuters Best 100 Photos of 2011. Some of these are gorgeous. Some of these are difficult to look at.

5) Famous paintings with irreverent new titles.

6) “Twe-twe-2016!” A truly terrible trailer for a movie from Ghana. So awful and so compelling. Video.

7) The series bible for the old D&D cartoon.