Screampunk

Standard

Is it really useful to point out that steampunk, as a genre, is not exactly known for hard science?

Hey, I know there are folks out there who love their sf hard. I know they think of “hardness” (as the term is used in the genre) as a virtue. And that’s fine for them. People should have their fun, especially if it makes them feel virtuous but I think its important to remember what a small subset of the overall readership these folks represent.

Most people don’t care, and wagging your finger at authors because, say, their zombies aren’t scientifically sound, just makes me shake my head and chuckle.

The political and cultural critiques of Steampunk have more weight, imo, to the degree they are fair and accurate.

Anyway, now that steampunk is pretty mainstream, it’s time for a new “-punk” sub-genre to spring up. Here are my predictions:

Pepperpunk–Set during the spice trade during the late 16th century, featuring wooden sailing ships and the sort of hostile native people we used to see “Chongo” fight on the Banana Splits. For the first few years, all novels will feature various thinly-veiled versions of Captain Jack Sparrow and humorously ahistorical references to “never having been to Singapore.” The speculative elements are deliberately fantasy, but sf fans still claim the stories (and complain about them) because–by tradition–they contain giant worms.

Tulippunk–Set in the “United Provinces” in 1630, this takes place in what is now the Netherlands. Dutch botanists make amazing breakthroughs with cross-breeding, creating gigantic tulips that fill themselves with hydrogen and have a root system strong enough to hold a basket full of people. Also featuring plant men who readily and unquestioningly accept second-class citizen status. Part of the appeal of this genre will be finger-wagging at speculative bubbles and other economic issues of dubious accuracy.

Screampunk–Add a chainsaw-wielding serial killer to any previously established genre. Collect check.

Obsidianpunk–Stories set in the pre-Columbian era of Mexico, Central, and South America. Typically features actual feathered serpents, crashed alien ships, and gorgeous dark-skinned young women being dragged up stone steps to a bloody altar. Hero should be some sort of warrior or possibly a bullied astrologer with a Jor El Complex. Features enough Evil Priests in Red Cloaks to make Diana Wynne Jones drain a whole bottle of cheap gin in one go.

Katanapunk–Set during the Meiji Restoration and featuring all the goggles, zeppelins, and gears that steampunk features, this subgenre will focus on Japanese political and cultural turmoil. Non-Japanese characters will have small roles or won’t appear at all. No one will visit the US or Europe, and all historical aspects will be rigorously researched and intelligently handled. It’ll be widely praised as the sort of thing people should be writing but will sell very few copies and die out quickly. This option is more for people who want to be admired than read.

Magicpunk–Pretty much what it says on the label.

What about you? Any ideas for the next -punk?

Randomness for 10/19

Standard

1) Ze Frank at TED Talks on connecting with others online. Video. This made me cry a little at the end, the way kindness sometimes does.

2) Author tries to run her career without an agent and loses her career.

3) Things John Scalzi doesn’t have to think about. This is a terrific post, and I’m glad he wrote it.

4) A really cool idea: My friend Shawn Granger is holding a contest to see who can make the best video trailer for his comic book series Family Bones. That’s the comic you see me reading in the video I posted the other day; it’s about some members of Shawn’s family in the midwest who turned out to be serial killers. Weird.

5) Arnold Schwarzenegger as Darth Vader. Video. Some NSFW language.

6) Q: Who said this about the separation of church and state: “You’re telling me that’s in the first amendment?” A. Answer. lol.

7) Wind power without the turbines.

While I’m in training all morning, I give you this:

Standard

Ten classic sf novels that were originally considered failures. What does it say about my knowledge of the genre that I haven’t even heard of some of these books? Also, must remember not to sell a book to a publisher owned by a bookstore. Yeesh.

I’ll be in training all morning and taking calls in the afternoon. I expect today to be worse than yesterday. Oh well.

Randomness for 10/15

Standard

1) A terrific book trailer for Everything Ravaged, Everything Burned. Video

2) Where good ideas come from. Video.

3) ‘Damn. Are we that different from people?’ I can’t think of any way to summarize this profile of Insane Clown Posse except to say that it’s really, really interesting. They’re evangelical Christians? (Added later: the SNL parody. Video. My reaction to that spoof: SNL is still on the air?)

4) Buy artificial hands to touch your baby. Hey, it’s not as creepy as this teddy bear made from a placenta! Hello, horror movie that is the real world.

5) Animator vs. Animation III. Video.

6) McDonald’s burgers can TOO grow mold on them, says McDonals.

7) Sir Ken Robinson talks modern education. Video. This is another RSA Animate video, and I love it. (Let’s ignore the Ritalin error)

Randomness for 10/12

Standard

1) Random House UK will publish novelizations of new and old Hammer Films. A fine idea, if you ask me.

2) My wife and I saw this guy’s art on the First Thursday Art Walk. Beautiful and fun.

3) Keep it classy, Europe! Mom discovers her missing daughter has been found dead on live TV, while standing in her killer’s dining room.

4) A firefighter speaks out about the firefighters who let a house in TN burn down because the owner hadn’t paid their fees.

5) Look at yourself. Now look at Grover. Back to yourself. Now back to Grover. Video.

6) Me, I just mailed mine.

7) 14 Inflatable Buildings. Maybe it reveals a flaw in my personality, but the urge to puncture the wedding chapel and have it deflate on the whole wedding party would be intense. Via Martha Wells.

Chapter 4 of A Glimpse of Darkness

Standard

Kelly Meding’s section of A Glimpse of Darkness just went live. Check it out and vote for what happens next!

That was the weekend

Standard

Apparently, I live in a world where I order checks from my bank but the checks never come. Yes, world, I know there are these things called electronic payments, but some stuff still wants a check.

Anyway, did you know that Monday morning is supposed to be the busiest web day of the week? We self-promoters are supposed to save “big” posts for now, when they’ll get the largest audience. Me, I’m writing about a box of checks that should’ve arrived already. See the famous author ply his craft.

In other vital news, for you weekend non-readers, I had a fun Saturday and Sunday, sort of. Sat was great, with a trip to the local Lego convention, BrickCon. Pictures here. I also received a ton of family-friendly rpg suggestions on my blog and LJ. Thank you to everyone who chimed in.

Sunday was quiet for various reasons. I set my laptop very high–on a stool on top of a table–so I could write standing up. The reduction in leg pain at the end of the day was startling; I’m going to try it again today.

If I were the sort of person who wanted to tie all this disparate stuff together (and I am) I’d link to Michelle Sagara’s posts about writerly self-promotion. Here’s part one. You can click through to the rest if you’re interested. I was and am.

She pulls together a lot of interesting ideas and presents them in a more coherent way than I would, and she also makes me realize that I’m okay with not being an internet celebrity a la Scalzi. Yeah, he sells a lot of books and has tremendous name recognition, but do you know how much time he must spend reading through his own comments, wielding the Mallet of Loving Correction?

I swear to god, I’d never have time for anything else.

I’m really lucky in that it’s extremely rare for me to get a nasty comment or annoying visitor–it hasn’t happened for months. Everyone who drops by here has been really kind to me, and I’m grateful for that. What I really need to do, mentally, is to separate my enjoyment of my own little space online with my desire for ten million people to read my books and Sam Worthington[1] to be cast in the movie version.

I’m off to make coffee and write now before the rest of the family wakes up. My wip has been coming together in my head in a rather sudden way, and I need to finish this scene and jump back to outlining. See you online.

[1]I’ve actually never seen any of the dude’s movies, but I assume he’d be great.

I’m wearing a sandwich-board sign that says “Harry Connolly, author”

Standard

Yesterday (the day before? omg–must get handle on life) Sherwood Smith linked to and discussed Sarah Prineas’s rant against authors who market their books (titled: “I will be your friend but I won’t be your fan”). I recommend reading both, including the links comments (corrected).

And yeah, I get it. I do a little marketing here and there: I’ll retweet a nice review, or give books away on my blog. I try not to be obnoxious about it, but everyone has different tolerances and I’m bound to annoy someone.

That said, I know very well that there’s little I can do to affect my own sales beyond write a book people want to read. The number of copies I’ve given away and whatever effect that might have, is a drop in the bucket compared to the number of books I’ve sold. But I do it anyway; don’t ask why.

I have my limits. This blog will never turn into all hard-sell all the time. First of all, because it would annoy me even more than it would annoy you. Second of all, because that’s not my job. Third of all, because even if it was, that job would suck and I’d quit. I won’t be sponsoring complicated contests where you have to type out a long string of book titles. I won’t be sending Facebook “fan” requests.” I don’t plan to do any readings. I won’t be asking people to give my 5-star reviews on Amazon.com or anywhere else. I won’t be asking people to call all their local bookstores and ask if they have have my latest in stock.

I will do other things, though. I’ll keep sending my books to reviewers (anyone want to recommend some? I don’t want to duplicate efforts from the first round, but I’m interested in finding new review venues). I’ll still donate books to charity auctions; this is my favorite thing to do, because it does a slight bit of good for the world at large. I’ll still sign bookstore stock. I’ll still have giveaways. I’ll still mention that most people can ask their libraries to stock certain books, hint hint.

Probably the most effective thing I’ve done is contact folks I know online who have large followings and offer the book to them in the hopes that they’ll review it. I try to emphasize that it’s at their convenience and I wouldn’t ask them to gin up a fake positive review. That doesn’t always work, of course. Sometimes they never get around to reading it. Sometimes the review is middling. That’s fine by me–I’m grateful for their time. But when they really like the book, that’s a big deal.

I mean, basically it’s all about word-of-mouth, but when we’re talking about online reading communities, some mouths have access to more ears than others. For ex: According to his figures, John Scalzi’s blog gets 35-40 thousand unique visitors a day. My blog? 52, and that’s on a pretty good day.

Maybe it’s just that I don’t want to leave everything up to other people. Maybe it’s just that I want to do my part in making the book succeed.

What do you guys think? Is there a level of promotion you like and expect (“You have a new book out? Why didn’t you tell us?”) and where do you get exasperated and turned off? Was there a particular author promotion you thought was effective? Have you ever bought a book because of an author’s marketing?

And just because, if you want two copies of Game of Cages leave a comment on my main blog or LiveJournal saying so. I’ll choose a random winner sometime tomorrow morning. The extra copy is so that, if you like the book, you can give it to a friend; if you don’t like it, you can give it to an enemy.

Randomness for 9/28

Standard

1) Several people have been linking to this lovely, dialog-free animation as a depiction of the atheist experience. I think they’re pretty much right. Video.

2) Did you know that, back in the 1970’s, Psychology Today published board games meant to raise awareness of social issues? “In Sommer’s version, however, the black player could not win; as a simulation of frustration, the game was too successful. Then David Popoff, a Psychology Today editor, redesigned the game, taking suggestions from militant black members of “US” in San Diego. The new rules give black players an opportunity to use—and even to beat—the System.”

3) “What We Talk About When We Talk About Men Not Reading”

4) Paintings based on Craig’s List “Missed Connections”.

5) Wizards of the Coast hiring an book editor for their D%D line.

6) Writers worst day jobs.

7) ZOMG! THE HAPPENING is real!

I was your puppet; you made me dance

Standard

As you guys know, I’ve been taking part in Suvudu’s reader-driven chain story, “A Glimpse of Darkness” (quick summary for those who don’t know what I’m talking about: five authors (Lara Adrian, Stacia Kane, Kelly Meding, and Lucy A. Snyder) are writing a “chain story.” Each week, one of us posts part of the story and at the end of the segment is a poll allowing the reader to choose what will happen next. A clear, full explanation is here.

Well, Lara Adrian’s first section went up last week, and the poll closed on Friday. I spent the weekend (skipping Foolscap) writing the next section, and guess what?

It’s live right now.

It’s, erm, longer than I’d intended, but that’s because I wanted to put in as much good stuff as possible. I gotta admit, it was fun to write (also stressful, because those other authors are way more experienced than I am, and I wanted to do good work).

Go! Read! Vote! And maybe, if you enjoy it, you can tell other readers about it.